
The Alameda Police Department wants to buy a Ballistic Armored Tactical Transport (BATT) vehicle for $174,000
The department is asking Alameda City Council to also approve a $302,000 expenditure for marked and unmarked patrol and utility vehicles.
According to the report provided to Alameda City Council, the BATT “is a four-wheel drive vehicle that is built on a Ford F-550 Super-Duty commercial chassis and is powered by a 6.8L V-10 gas engine. The BATT comes armored in Level NIJ IV/B7 and can stop .50 Caliber rounds, giving police personnel the ability to stop the majority of threats that may be encountered. The BATT offers a six-sided, complete protection package in a very maneuverable and versatile size. The protection package includes a blast mitigating floor, internal armored firewall, rifle rated roof protection, and a fully-armored hood. In addition to these benefits, it can accommodate 10-12 geared officers and achieve highway speeds up to 80 miles per hour.”
The vehicle is manufactured by The Armored Group, LLC of Fort Worth, Texas, and, according to a federal Department of Homeland Security website, is manufactured on demand.
The additional 10 vehicles to be purchased for the patrol fleet are:
- Police Interceptor Utility, Unmarked Staff Vehicle
- 3 Police Interceptor Utilities, Patrol Supervisors and School Resource Officer
- 4 Police Interceptor Eco Sedans, Unmarked Staffllnvestigations Vehicles
- 2 Police Interceptor Eco Sedans, Marked Patrol Vehicles
The funds to buy all the vehicles will come from the Equipment Replacement Fund budget.
Earlier this year, Alameda City Council put a 30-year, 1/2 cent tax increase measure on the ballot, saying the new revenue was necessary to fund fire and police vehicle replacement. Alameda voters rejected the measure on June 5th.

Twitter Feed


I really object to this militarization of our police department.
Is there any way we can stop this? What a completely lousy use of our resources. Cops in Alameda should be on bicycles, we don’t need a tank!!!
Here are some various articles on the militarization of local police:
http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2011/11/how-the-war-on-terror-has-militarized-the-police/248047/
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/04/sunday-review/have-american-police-become-militarized.html?pagewanted=all
http://www.alternet.org/story/153098/police_or_paramilitary_forces_the_militarization_of_american_law_enforcement
http://www.forbes.com/sites/bradlockwood/2011/11/30/the-militarizing-of-local-police/
Marie – I’m with you! It’s ridiculous.
I thought this was a joke when I first saw it. I’m with Marie too: This is unnecessary and not appropriate for our police force.
It is a done deal. It does not matter what you think…
Remember? The skies were falling without taxing citizens, and now what? Money is there to fund all the “stuff” they could not fund without taxing us.
Terrorist attacks? You’ve got to be kidding! The closest thing Alameda has to terrorists are the guys in the red trucks wearing blue while shopping at Safeway and Lucky’s, aided by BONTA, TAM and GILMORE. They are the ones terrorizing our budget and putting the City’s financial well being at fault. Honestly the biggest threat to Alamedans recently has been people not paying attention to their surroundings and getting ripped off for their cellphones.
I’m with you, Barb. It’s a mockery.